(Yesterday’s column. The photos do not appear on the print and online versions of Manila Standard Today.)
Last Sunday, we visited the popular Market at the Hills along Temple Drive in Quezon City. Most of the stalls sold food but there was one, Bambuza, selling products made from bamboo and banana fiber. There were beautiful picture frames, custom-made cards, gift boxes and resin plates inlaid with pieces of bamboo. They were beautiful. Designed by local artists and locally made from local materials, it was one of those instances when the “Buy Filipino” slogan made so much sense.



It stirred a sense of pride inside me, really, seeing those beautiful products made by Filipinos and not even missing the environment factor. Instead of denuding the forests further to make craft paper from trees, bamboo and banana leaves and barks, both of which we have in abundance, have taken center stage. If beauty alone were my consideration, I would have bought everything from that stall and probably ordered some more to be picked up at a later date. The fact that the products are environment-friendly makes them even more attractive. But for every wise shopper, price is a consideration as well. None of the products were inexpensive. I could only afford to order a few pieces that I knew I would treasure for a long time.
I found myself mentally traveling back in time to a few months ago when we were furnishing our new house and my husband and I were looking for table lamps, floor lamps and pendant lamps. We went to a store called Keystone and their pieces were just magnificent. Unfortunately, the prices were beyond our budget. My husband was so disappointed that, within seconds of getting in the car, he went on a tirade about how Filipinos would ever feel encouraged to patronize local products when the prices are beyond the reach of the average Juan and Juana. To make a long story short, we ended up buying less expensive lighting fixtures made either in China or Taiwan.
It’s the same thing for the mothers and fathers who chose to buy unlabeled powdered milk to feed their babies. It’s a matter of economics. You just can’t argue with a consumer by insisting that in the long term, we would be helping ourselves more if we keep the local economy going by consciously choosing to buy Philippine-made products. The consumer who lives with a finite budget week by week, month by month, won’t really care about the long term if he’s already having a hard time making it through the short term.
It’s not about lack of patriotism. It’s just pragmatism. The truth is, in many cases, local products are more expensive than imported ones. I’m an advocate of Philippine agriculture but when push comes to shove, it’s really easier said than done. I can’t remember the last time I chose to buy local onions and garlic over the cheaper imports from Taiwan. It’s not because I believe that Taiwan garlic and onions are superior in quality. It’s because their prices are friendlier.
If we’re going to get political, philosophical and idealistic about it, we’d say that to boost local industries, the government should not allow the entry of products that compete directly with local ones. But that would be unfavorable to the consumer, wouldn’t it, who can only afford the cheaper imported products. Where’s the middle ground then? Is it not possible to boost local industries without detriment to the consumer who will be forced to buy their products at whatever prices they dictate?
When government explains why we import agricultural products that, ironically, we already produce locally, the most common explanation is shortage. We don’t produce enough, they say, so we import. But that’s not really accurate. The truth is that shortage is often artificial. There is shortage in the local markets because we export the best harvest and only sell locally whatever leftovers there are, mostly those whose quality do not pass export standards. The rejects, in other words.
Ergo, we are told we don’t have enough chicken or pork or beef and we see the markets flooded with chicken from the United States, beef and lamb from Australia and New Zealand, etcetera, etcetera. But because these imported meat are excess produce from their countries of origin, they are exported at rock-bottom prices. And while local producers are heavily taxed by the Philippine government, under the system of globalization, products of other countries enjoy a lot of incentives, including preferential customs and tariff rates, when they enter the Philippines. Is it really any wonder why by the time they reach our supermarkets, their retail prices are even lower than those of their local counterparts?
You see the difference? These exporter countries only sell abroad their excess produce. They satisfy their local markets first where you can be sure the prices are affordable for the majority because there is no great discrepancy between supply and demand. Conversely, we deprive local consumers at the first instance, leaving them no choice but to buy cheaper imported goods. It’s true with agricultural products; it’s true with non-essentials like floor lamps, garments and children’s toys.
But why would any conscientious local producer choose to export first and sell locally secondarily? First, because the buying capacity of consumers in First World countries is higher so the same products that can only be sold locally at cheap prices can command higher prices abroad. And, second, because the Philippine government provides more incentives to exporters than to local sellers. Go read the law on value-added tax (Title IV of the National Internal Revenue Code)–export sales by VAT-registered persons (corporations are juridical persons) are subject to zero percent VAT.
It’s all part of globalization, of course, the tagline of the new millennium. Our government has signed pacts and treaties obliging the Philippines to open its markets to products from other countries. The thing is, under the circumstances, the push to “Buy Filipino!” will never see fruition.





















{ 18 comments… read them below or add one }
Miguk 10.09.08 at 8:31 am
The internal market here is huge. I imagine the economy could be self-sufficient and not have to import anything. Another sad thing I notice is that when they say “local” it is almost a code word for substandard and low quality
Connie Veneracion 10.09.08 at 8:46 am
Re I imagine the economy could be self-sufficient and not have to import anything.
I believe that too — if only self-sufficiency were the priority rather than profits, it can be done. Sadly, government doesn’t see it that way.
Re when they say “local†it is almost a code word for substandard and low quality
‘Cause we get the rejects. The “export-quality” goods are not sold here. Insulting, actually, like the residents only deserve the rejects.
JMonreal 10.09.08 at 10:22 am
When government officials, the rich, and famous personalities in the entertainment industry buy foreign goods instead of local or Filipino products, I don’t know why a lot of people want to do the same. Is it colonial mentality?
I think everybody in the government, starting from the top, need to set the example buy patronising and buying Filipino products.
Miguk 10.09.08 at 10:23 am
Really? That is really sad. There should be one standard — and hopefully that standard would be high.
Connie Veneracion 10.09.08 at 10:32 am
JMonreal, colonial mentality and bandwagon mentality and starstruck mentality.
Miguk, goods that are originally meant for the local markets are sold here as is, not as rejects. But anything originally meant for export (including prawns and mangoes, believe me), well, we only get what cannot be exported for one reason or another. In the garments and handicrafts industries, they are called overruns. But most of the time they’re really rejects.
JMonreal 10.09.08 at 11:06 am
I have not seen any quality prawns or mangoes from the Philippines here in Florida. Canned mango juice, yes, but with only 20% mango juice from Cebu - the rest of the ingredients are made up of water and lots of sugar.
I’ve seen a lot of brand name quality polo and T-shirts from the Philippines. Very expensive - as high as $65 a shirt. I wait till a store gives an extra discount for an already discounted price and buy the ones made from the Philippines. Will that help some Filipinos back home? Maybe.
JuanDelaCruz 10.09.08 at 11:37 am
to really dig into the profit margin of bambuzla
consider raw material is indigenously inexpensive
local artisan labor is less than $5.00/hour
the scale & simplicity of the manufacturing process can be reasonably best guessed,
leaving ambiguous designer fees, but which common sense dictates be also within reason.
leaving.. an arbitrarily handsome profit margin. ( 175% price tag omitted )
Miguk 10.09.08 at 2:34 pm
I don’t mind rejects — in fact my favorite store in the U.S. is Goodwill hahahaha. I agree with JMonreal. I refuse to buy a shirt in the U.S. that was made in the Philippines for $65. I just can’t do it knowing how much I could get it for at the palenke. I also don’t know if that is hurting the workers here though.
Connie Veneracion 10.09.08 at 4:11 pm
Miguk, Here’s my favorite story about exports and prices. A friend, a stewardess with Cathay Pacific, once came home with clothes for her young niece. I was there when she unpacked the dresses. She was gushing (the dresses were really cute) and saying they were made in Hong Kong (base of Cathay Pacific) and the cost so much. We inspected the dresses and guess what? MADE IN THE PHILIPPINES.
JuanDelaCruz, re “labor is less than $5.00/hour”. Source please?
JMonreal, oh, you should read about the law that was created specifically to allow Japanese corporations to fish in Philippine waters and bring their catch directly to Japan. Florida produces mangoes so I don’t think that’s a destination for Philippine mangoes.
JMonreal 10.09.08 at 7:56 pm
Connie, we have all kinds of mangoes coming from all over South America and the Caribbean, but nothing compared to Philippine mangoes - small, very sweet, and not grainy.
JMonreal 10.10.08 at 12:18 am
WOW! What kind of Japanese deal did our fishermen (government officials) received in return? Maybe our schools should encourage younger Filipinos to specialize in government service instead, and get paid by the Japanese corporations or other foreign companies that harvest all our resources.
Connie Veneracion 10.10.08 at 7:07 am
WEll, let’s just say that local fishermen became “marginal.” It was a Marcos law. And such laws have multiplied. Just recently, foreign corporations were granted the right to enter mining. The Constitution says exploitation of natural resources are reserved to Filipino citizens but does government abide by the Constitution?
Miguk 10.10.08 at 2:03 pm
hahahaha that’s what I mean. I can’t force myself to buy some outrageously priced garmet in the U.S. that was made in the Philippines cause I know how much it would be here….plus the workers are not the ones benefiting from the huge markup anyway.
On natural resources, I just read they started pumping oil for the first time of Palawan? I hope its a big field.
Connie Veneracion 10.10.08 at 2:55 pm
Yeah, but the Philippines is not necessarily the beneficiary of Palawan oil. We get oil only if the investors decide to sell the oil directly to us. Even if they do, they still get to dictate the price. That’s the problem when non-Filipinos are allowed to exploit our natural resources.
Miguk 10.14.08 at 1:51 pm
I’m sure there must be some percentage involved for the country. Whatever happend the the deuterium discovery I wonder?
ApplesH 10.20.08 at 5:57 am
Connie- I have only come to understand such details on consumer products through this post. Thanks for the information.
tisha 11.20.08 at 1:57 pm
hi connie,
i’ve been reading your blog since i was studying in japan three years ago. you’re right about us being on the receiving end of export-rejected agricultural produce. for agri-fisheries, our no. 1 market is japan. unfortunately, the japan market has recently (about 3 years ago) imposed a “positive list system” for imported fresh produce. meaning, it now imposes maximum residue limit (MRL) for all chemicals used in fruit and vegetable production. RP is having a very hard time adhering to this and we have, in fact, violated japan’s MRLs on fresh okra, asparagus and mango exports several times this year. as a result, all of our exports of the mentioned products now undergo 100% inspection before entering japanese markets. but that not the sad thing.
the sad thing is that while we monitor the sanitary and phytosanitary conditions of our exportable products, we hardy do this for those intended for domestic consumption. can you imagine ingesting pesticides while enjoying fresh lettuce and tomato? the thing is, it’s insanely expensive to run tests on every fresh produce. this is the reason why, organic farming should be encouraged. btw, there are certain standards to be followed before one’s farm can be really certified as organic.
as for chicken, we do have very expensive chicken. i beg to disagree though that we export more chicken than we do distribute locally. in fact, we are not competitive in the international market as far as chicken is concerned. we import mostly our chicken feeds — such as corn and soya oil — hence our high chicken prices. in fact, japan has been pestering us to supply them chicken for yakitori but we could not meet the volume that it needs — not even a quarter. besides, we can never compete with brazil’s market price on this. the same story goes for our other prospective chicken markets abroad.
as for mango in the US, the reason why the US is not prime target for philippine mangoes is because it’s too expensive to export RP mangoes there. if i were the exporter, why would i go to the US (and compete with mexican’s ‘manila’ mango which is soooo much cheaper because it just crosses the border by truckloads) when i can export to taiwan, hongkong, japan and other asian markets? aside from the domestic market, RP mangoes primarily go to japan and hongkong.
FYI lang po and keep blogging. i love your recipes and articles.
tisha 11.20.08 at 2:09 pm
“Re I imagine the economy could be self-sufficient and not have to import anything.
I believe that too — if only self-sufficiency were the priority rather than profits, it can be done. Sadly, government doesn’t see it that way.”
As for the argument above, i just personally think that profit is the concern of producers/exporters/private entities, not by governments. government cannot or should not dictate private entities how to conducts their business. i do admit we have a problem with production and self-sufficiency. government should focus its energies and logistics to boost local production instead of relying on imports. then again, in the advent of freeir trade, importing is unavoidable.